Post by mdnoyon on Jan 15, 2024 3:52:01 GMT
Today it is increasingly frequent online (on social media and blogs) - and unfortunately also in some books - the diffusion of signs and symbols introduced into writing both to combat presumed linguistic sexism and to create communication that overcomes the "gender binary" of the Italian language". According to some, the gender binary represents a "rigid distinction between male and female". It is therefore appropriate for these people to read a book on mammals, the class to which we belong. The signs introduced in the so-called "inclusive writing" are the asterisk (*), what in Italian we call snail (@) and the schwa (ə) - which OpenOffice does not even include among the special characters - a Hebrew graphic symbol subscribed to a grapheme consonantal (which therefore has nothing to do with our language).
Perhaps the most operetta-like solution is the rein Phone Number List troduction of the neuter , which many champions of inclusiveness propose: inclusive writing, which claims to be innovative, proves to be traditionalist with the choice of the neuter, present in Latin. The inclusive aberration and the danger of this linguistic drift In 2017 the French Academy 1 published a declaration, adopted unanimously by its members, on so-called inclusive writing . The declaration contested the diffusion of those signs that I illustrated before, because they create a disunited language, confusion in readers and practically illegible texts. Asterisks, @ and schwa are real obstacles to writing and reading , both visually and aloud. The French Academy said that “in the face of this inclusive aberration the French language is now in mortal danger.” And I say the same about the Italian language, already ruined by the continuous and unjustified recourse to English.
What Redeker claims is also applicable to our country: inclusive writing closes the relationship between Italy and its literature. It makes a clean cut to its entire literary history, to its cultural past, erasing centuries and centuries of literary works forever (remember that we live in a century that invented cancellation culture ). Not even Marinetti, genius creator of Futurism and bitter enemy of traditionalism and academism, inventor of free-word writing , would have welcomed inclusive writing. Despite his linguistic anarchism, Marinetti, an impulsive neologist and fervent defender of Italianity, has never trampled on the Italian language, as the supporters of inclusive language and the Anglomaniacs are doing. Inclusive writing - with its ridiculous signs and its illogical reduplications - deconstructs Italian.
Perhaps the most operetta-like solution is the rein Phone Number List troduction of the neuter , which many champions of inclusiveness propose: inclusive writing, which claims to be innovative, proves to be traditionalist with the choice of the neuter, present in Latin. The inclusive aberration and the danger of this linguistic drift In 2017 the French Academy 1 published a declaration, adopted unanimously by its members, on so-called inclusive writing . The declaration contested the diffusion of those signs that I illustrated before, because they create a disunited language, confusion in readers and practically illegible texts. Asterisks, @ and schwa are real obstacles to writing and reading , both visually and aloud. The French Academy said that “in the face of this inclusive aberration the French language is now in mortal danger.” And I say the same about the Italian language, already ruined by the continuous and unjustified recourse to English.
What Redeker claims is also applicable to our country: inclusive writing closes the relationship between Italy and its literature. It makes a clean cut to its entire literary history, to its cultural past, erasing centuries and centuries of literary works forever (remember that we live in a century that invented cancellation culture ). Not even Marinetti, genius creator of Futurism and bitter enemy of traditionalism and academism, inventor of free-word writing , would have welcomed inclusive writing. Despite his linguistic anarchism, Marinetti, an impulsive neologist and fervent defender of Italianity, has never trampled on the Italian language, as the supporters of inclusive language and the Anglomaniacs are doing. Inclusive writing - with its ridiculous signs and its illogical reduplications - deconstructs Italian.